 RGB 150dpi (1).jpg)
In 2017, I wrote a piece for Inside Higher Ed arguing for the abolition of college football on moral grounds. The essay attracted the ire of the board of my own university, plenty of messages of support, and one juicy piece of hate mail from a guy who may never have attended college and addressed me as "missy." So it's a pleasure to deliver a guest essay from a current president who is well aware of the complexities of America's most brutal and ridiculous game and the brutal and ridiculous finances that go along with it. If only T. Swizzle could throw a little of her sparkle on higher ed the way she just did the NFL, we'd be in a lot better shape. |
Guest essayThe writer is a current president I once told a friend I was going to write a book entitled “The Magical Power of Football.” The book would explore why intercollegiate football seems to lead some among of us presidents to make decisions that defy logic. As president, you become pretty good at saying some version of “that dog won’t hunt” when pitched an idea that you know from experience will not live up to the breathless assertions of success, fame, glory, and endless revenue that will come flowing in once you approve the plan. You know that feeling—the one you get when people making a pitch imply that you and only you stand between their idea and new levels of success and institutional greatness. And yet, some presidents—even smart, rational people trained in research and who usually make data-informed decisions—can get carried away by what are, let’s face it, magical assertions. Why would the leader of a university whose enrollment is in a sharp and sustained decline pay a football coach several times the salary of the lowest paid coach in the league, even when at the same time cutting its institutional budget? Why do presidents announce new facilities and expensive renovations for existing ones even while eliminating academic departments and firing tenured professors? Why do they sign coaches to long-term contracts to then buy them out for millions of dollars? One online definition of magic mentions things “wonderful and exciting” driven by “mysterious or supernatural forces.” Not to go all first-year student-y, but Wikipedia defines “high magic,” also known as theurgy and or ritual magic, as “more complex, involving lengthy and detailed rituals as well as sophisticated, sometimes expensive, paraphernalia.” What does that sound like to you? For presidents who don their school colors from head to toe, as I do every home game Saturday, believing in the magical power of football springs from a couple of sources. Higher ed is an industry without clear markers of prestige, aside, say, from being in the Ivy League, or maybe membership in the Association of American Universities—although no one outside of academia knows or cares what the latter is. If you have little hope of climbing Carnegie categories or ascending the rankings, the football stadium scoreboard makes clear which school won, something nearly impossible to ascertain for the rest of higher education. For the most part I’m not talking about the powerhouses of the gridiron. I’m talking about regional universities, those in the so-called Group of 5, the ones Peyton Manning once referred to as “directional schools,” where large football expenditures are funded primarily through student fees and by reallocating general operating funds to athletics. Those schools get positive football press coverage even if their overall graduation rates are lower than their teams’ average points scored per game. Another source of the reliance on magic, which stems from the first source, comes from pressure applied by a combination of boosters and university trustees. Some of the latter love football (I do, too) and maybe some of them played football at their alma mater, and they are, impossible to forget, your bosses. What’s a president who hesitates to emulate these “big schools” to do when pressured to spend like they do? After all, at that moment you are the only thing standing between new levels of prestige and institutional greatness. Do the students care? Are most of them really attending games? While it’s true that many athletics programs generate some level of school spirit and serve as the front porch of the university, it’s also the case that most students file out of the stadium by the end of the first half. Unless you have a really good marching band; then they’ll leave at the beginning of the third quarter. And then there’s this: football at the Football Bowl Subdivision level costs a shitload of money (I once worked with a CFO who defined “shitload” as “two buttloads”). The truth is, I continue to drink the magic elixir myself, even while wrestling with whether to steer our university away from this arms race. I haven’t done so, honestly, because all I would do over the next two years or so is defend this decision, assuming, of course, that I lasted two years after making the move. That, and I really do enjoy watching football games. |
Weekly WisdomSandbox co-builider Doug Lederman and Bridget Burns just started a new season of their podcast interviews with current presidents. They discuss their favorite episodes from last season here. |
In the "You Can't Make This Stuff Up" CategoryFrom a current president - a true story that inspired last week's Apple Pie Day In my first presidency, I scheduled a campus tour my first week on the job. In most every hallway, there was a centrally located but, well, unique collection of recycling bins. Most containers were labeled with a sheet of paper declaring its purpose, typically hung crooked with some tape. I asked the facilities director if there was something we could do about the eyesore. He agreed it was a problem and volunteered to get pricing on matching recycling stations. I thought nothing more of it until an appointment appeared on my calendar the next week. A faculty member, chair of the institution’s sustainability committee, asked my assistant to set up a meeting to discuss “Why the new president hates recycling.” Word had spread about my beautification request, which was received as “the president doesn’t believe in recycling and wants the building recycling stations removed.” This had led to an emergency meeting of the sustainability committee at which the chair was dispatched to meet with the new president. I was able to defuse the situation by clarifying my intent was nothing more than to clean up the area – making recycling more inviting. I thanked the faculty member for requesting the meeting. Now I shudder to think how many rumors of my evilness remain uncontested because no one bothers to share them with me for confirmation or discussion. From a current president: Barely a few weeks into my tenure as provost, I was briefed on plans to liberate space in the library. They ranged from: “weeding” books and periodicals that had not been checked out in decades; warehousing materials at a remote location from which they could be shuttled back to campus if someone requested them; and purchasing modern rolling, compact book stacks to keep those books in house but tightly packed in case they needed to be fished out but generally inaccessible for browsing. I asked how much the stacks would cost and how much space they would liberate. Based on the response, I suggested that it would be good to explore that route further as it would reduce the space needed for books by 50 percent. I then left for the airport. A few days later, midway across the country, I got a frantic call saying a vote of no confidence was afoot. People were outraged that I was calling for the elimination of 50 percent of our library holdings. That I was doing so without consultation. That I would surely privilege STEM titles. That the library should be considered the preeminent repository of knowledge and learning in a university. I was accused of going back to book burning times (more than a dozen years since this happened, we are seeing policy makers that feel too comfy with this idea). From a former president: Reminds me of the time when my institution of higher education had an abundance of part-time support positions open and I mentioned filling them with student workers and "becoming a work college." A spreadsheet arrived within a week of all the rules and regulations for officially designated Work Colleges, current membership, and why it wasn't a fit for us. From a current president: This week in Things I Swear Don’t Happen to Other Presidents: Student’s emotional support dog quietly pees on my trouser leg while student and I are chatting. |
The Litter BoxWe believe in diversity, equity, and inclusion. We believe in access. We know the field isn’t level but think everyone should get to play—not just those with pedigrees and good breeding but also the scrappier ones who may have had a rougher start in life. This applies to institutions (community colleges as well as research universities), leaders (the Ivy-all-the-ways and those who came from less “traditional” backgrounds), and animal companions (we're not speciest). This is the only place where Insiders can show their snouts (beaks, whiskers) wearing institutional affiliations or school colors. ![]() Bailey Matos-Arabia (she/her/ella), la Jefa de CUNY Chancellor
|